On this page I will provide links to various regulations which may apply
to  the  control of a narrow tilting vehicle.

The most important point to maintain in focus is that when the vehicle
width  is reduced  the control of the tilt becomes an integral component of
the control of the steer of the vehicle.

Regulations always speak of the "directional control of the vehicle".  
Obviously this is the fundamental requirement.

Conventional vehicles have tilt control built in [motorcar], and so
directional control of the vehicle is concerned only with steer of the
wheels[ or manipulation by "skid steer"]. In a narrow vehicle the control of
the tilt is required before the control of the  steer can be effective, so when
we speak of "all components necessary for the effective directional control
of the vehicle", we must  be aware of the implications.

Clearly,  if you reduce the width of a vehicle there is a point where control
of the tilt is a mandatory component. Of course the actual consideration is
the" track width"  : "height of the mass" ratio.

Briefly there are a few options for failsafe control of the tilt/steer

1]   Make  control of both tilt and steer mechanically based.   A conventional
motorcycle does this but requires additional driver skills. FTC  can also do
this and requires no skill above conventional motorcar control.

2]    Ensure that the tilt is controlled to the vertical position during a system
failure and rely on  conventional wheel steer.   The CARVER does this, and
so the Carver must conform to the stability rules for non tilt 3 wheeled
vehicles and is "wide".

3]   Ensure that there is a reserve of stored energy to allow for a limited
number of tilt cycles. The CLEVER is proposed to operate like this.

4\   Ensure that there are two independent methods to provide control
during the failure of  any system.

Recent alterations to the rule UN/ECE Regulation 79 allow for a wide range
of solutions, many of the traditional requirements for mechanical operation
of components  required for the effective steer of the vehicle have been
relaxed . However the fundamental requirement remains the "easy ,safe
and effective directional control of the vehicle".   The manufacturer must be
able to prove his case.

The regulations are further interpreted by individual countries  and I will
include these interpretations.

The links to the documents are in the margins of this page and I hope they
assist. I will update  and add information, so any information or comments
are welcomed                
E MAIL ME
"CLEVER"
CONTROL
STYSTEM
The regulations for " failsafe control" are construction requirements. There are separate regulations
for satisfactory vehicle performance which are sometimes incorporated into the same document.
"The introduction of a motorcycle with control
characteristics which  are easy safe and
effective, would be a major contribution to the
development of efficient personal transport
"

Phillip James.   www. tiltingvehicle.com


UN/ECE 79

OVERVIEW of 79

TILTING VEHICLE
REGULATIONS
New Zealand
Interpretation
Australian
Interpretation
pre 79